The Morality of Tax Avoidance

Creighton Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 693-745, 2010

Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 9/2012

54 Pages Posted: 29 Jul 2010 Last revised: 8 Apr 2015

See all articles by Zoë M. Prebble

Zoë M. Prebble

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law

John Prebble KC

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law; Institut für Österreichisches und Internationales Steuerrecht, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien; University of Notre Dame Australia - School of Law

Date Written: 2010

Abstract

If “tax avoidance” means “contriving legal transactions that reduce tax in ways that are contrary to legislative policy”, then “evasion” is illegal reduction and “mitigation” is unexceptionable reduction. Apparently, tax avoidance may occur endogenously, within the existing economic framework of a business or an estate plan, or exogenously, by resort to an independent tax shelter. The distinction is apparent, but not real. (a) Whether an arrangement amounts to avoidance and, if so, (b) whether the avoidance is moral are fundamentally the same questions in all contexts, including estate planning. Judges sometimes claim that tax avoidance is moral. That claim appears to be based on the distinction that avoidance is legal whereas evasion is illegal. A legal/illegal test cannot determine questions of morality. Others who aver that tax avoidance is moral base their claims on four assumptions: that taxpayers have a moral right to their pre-tax income; that avoidance is a victimless activity; that the immorality of evasion is derived solely from its illegality (and therefore that avoidance, which has the same factual matrix, is moral); and that morality is wholly independent of the law. These assumptions are mistaken. Evasion is immoral in a deep sense, not simply as malum prohibitum. Since evasion and avoidance share their essential elements, and are separated only by a legal difference, it follows that avoidance is also immoral. Public opinion can test this conclusion, albeit imperfectly. The approach is deontological, focusing on actions, not on agents, and comparative, drawing on cases from several jurisdictions.

Keywords: Income Tax Law, Tax Shelters, Anti-Avoidance, Morality, Estate Planning, malum in se, Tax Evasion, Tax Avoidance, Ethics, Duke of Westminster, Learned Hand

JEL Classification: K34

Suggested Citation

Prebble, Zoë M. and Prebble KC, John, The Morality of Tax Avoidance (2010). Creighton Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 693-745, 2010, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 9/2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1650363

Zoë M. Prebble

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

HOME PAGE: http://people.wgtn.ac.nz/zoe.prebble

John Prebble KC (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand
+64 4 463 6311 (Phone)
Papers Indexed at HOME PAGE (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/law/staff/prebble-scholarly.aspx

Institut für Österreichisches und Internationales Steuerrecht, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien ( email )

Welthandelsplatz 1
Vienna, Wien 1020
Austria

University of Notre Dame Australia - School of Law

Sydney Campus, New South Wales
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
5,250
Abstract Views
20,239
Rank
3,091
PlumX Metrics