Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Cracking the Code to Writing Legal Arguments: From IRAC to CRARC to Combinations in Between

New York State Bar Association Journal, Vol. 82, No. 6, July/August 2010

6 Pages Posted: 2 Aug 2010  

Gerald Lebovits

Columbia University - Law School; Fordham University School of Law; New York University School of Law

Date Written: July 1, 2010

Abstract

This article discusses how to organize the argument section of trial and appellate briefs and discusses the IRARC/CRARC methods as options to IRAC, BaRAC, CIRAC, CRAFADC, CREAC, CRuPAC, FIRAC, FORAC, IDAR, IGPAC, ILAC, IRAAAPC, IREAC, MIRAT, RAFADC, TREACC, and TRRAC.

Keywords: leagl writing, IRAC, IRARC, CRARC, BaRAC, CIRAC, CRAFADC, CREAC, CRuPAC, FIRAC, FORAC, IDAR, IGPAC, ILAC, IRAAAPC, IREAC, MIRAT, RAFADC, TREACC, TRRAC

Suggested Citation

Lebovits, Gerald, Cracking the Code to Writing Legal Arguments: From IRAC to CRARC to Combinations in Between (July 1, 2010). New York State Bar Association Journal, Vol. 82, No. 6, July/August 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1650923

Gerald Lebovits (Contact Author)

Columbia University - Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.columbia.edu/fac/Gerald_Lebovits

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.fordham.edu/adjunct/23484.htm

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.nyu.edu/graduateaffairs/graduatelawyering/facultybios

Paper statistics

Downloads
2,182
Rank
4,912
Abstract Views
7,066