Protection of 'Innocent Lawbreakers': Striking the Right Balance in the Private Enforcement of the Anti 'Junk Fax' Provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

72 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2010 Last revised: 24 Sep 2011

See all articles by Yuri R. Linetsky

Yuri R. Linetsky

University of Alabama - School of Law; Case Western Reserve University School of Law

Date Written: August 3, 2010

Abstract

Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), recipients of so-called “junk faxes” can sue the sender in state court to recover statutory damages of up to $500 per fax - $1,500 if the fax was sent “willfully.” But these high statutory damage provisions have led to severe negative consequences to “innocent lawbreakers”: small businesses who unintentionally run afoul of the Act’s prohibitions.

Though Congress, with the best intentions, set out to regulate conduct that it believed shifted the costs of advertising form the advertiser to the recipient who was forced to pay for paper and ink to print unwanted advertisements, the inclusion of a private right of action led to the development of a cottage industry of plaintiffs lawyers for whom filing TCPA claims is a significant source of revenue. This Article argues that the unintended effects of the anti-junk fax provisions of the TCPA are most detrimental to small businesses that are placed at risk of significant financial harm for causing only nominal damages to owners of facsimile machines. This is especially true after the real targets of the legislation - large “blast faxers” - have been driven out of business through the enforcement of the Act.

This Article argues that, by properly interpreting that Act’s definition of a “facsimile machine,” and applying traditional litigation requirements and equitable doctrines, courts can fulfill Congress’ intention that the Act’s harshest penalties are reserved for truly willful violators. It goes on to suggest that class actions should be eliminated because, when combined with the Act’s statutory damages provision, its effects are devastating to small businesses. It also argues that states should restrict private TCPA enforcement actions to small-claims courts, as Congress envisioned. Thus, innocent lawbreakers can be better protected without negatively affecting enforcement against intentional violators of the Act.

Keywords: Junk Faxes, Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Blast Faxes, Federal Communications Commission

JEL Classification: K20, K41, K42

Suggested Citation

Linetsky, Yuri R., Protection of 'Innocent Lawbreakers': Striking the Right Balance in the Private Enforcement of the Anti 'Junk Fax' Provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (August 3, 2010). Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 90, p. 70, 2011; Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-26. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1652844

Yuri R. Linetsky (Contact Author)

University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.ua.edu/clinic

Case Western Reserve University School of Law ( email )

11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106-7148
United States
(216) 368-6855 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
119
Abstract Views
718
rank
233,318
PlumX Metrics