The Consumer Revolution: Turning Point in Human History, or Statistical Artifact?
21 Pages Posted: 5 Aug 2010
Date Written: July 4, 2010
Abstract
A Farewell to Alms argued based on wages, rents and returns on capital that the English by 1800 were no wealthier than in 1400. An argument against this has been the supposed consumer revolution of 1600-1750. Since ordinary families by 1750 begin routinely consuming former luxury goods, income must have risen much faster than wages through a concomitant industrious revolution. This paper argues that the consumer and industrious revolutions of 1600-1750 are artifacts created by misinterpreting the major source on consumption in these years, probate inventories. Properly interpreted there is no conflict between wages, income and consumption in England 1600-1750.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Daniel E. Bogart and Gary Richardson
-
Property Rights and Parliament in Industrializing Britain
By Daniel E. Bogart and Gary Richardson
-
Estate Acts, 1600 to 1830: A New Source for British History
By Daniel E. Bogart and Gary Richardson
-
Gentlewomanly Capitalism? Spinsters, Widows, and Wealth Holding in England and Wales, C. 1800-1860
By David R. Green and Alastair Owens
-
English and Scottish Overseas Trade, 1300-1600
By Martin Rorke
-
English and Scottish Overseas Trade, 13001600
By Martin Rorke
-
The Surprising Wealth of Pre-Industrial England
By Gregory Clark, Joseph Cummins, ...