Journal of National Security Law and Policy, Vol. 4, p. 343, 2010
27 Pages Posted: 6 Aug 2010 Last revised: 10 Jun 2011
Date Written: August 5, 2010
The Obama administration has continued to apply the wartime paradigm first developed by the Bush administration after 9/11 to respond to terrorism. In cases of trials before military commissions, indefinite detention, and targeted killing, the U.S. has continued to claim wartime privileges even with respect to persons and situations far from any battlefield. This article argues that both administrations have made a basic error in the choice of law. Wartime privileges may be claimed when armed conflict conditions prevail as defined by international law. These privileges are not triggered by declarations or policy preferences.
Keywords: armed conflict, terrorism, global war on terror, targeted killing, military commissions, detention, drones
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
O'Connell, Mary Ellen, The Choice of Law Against Terrorism (August 5, 2010). Journal of National Security Law and Policy, Vol. 4, p. 343, 2010; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 10-20. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1654049