The Lucas Paradox and the Quality of Institutions: Then and Now
16 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2010
Date Written: February 1, 2008
Abstract
In the first era of financial globalization (1880-1914), global capital market integration led to substantial net capital movements from rich to poor economies. The historical experience stands in contrast to the contemporary globalization where gross capital mobility is equally high, but did not incite a substantial transfer of savings from rich to poor economies. Using data for the historical and modern periods we extend Lucas’ (1990) original model and show that differences in institutional quality between rich and poor countries can account for the sharply divergent patterns of international capital movements.
Keywords: capital market integration, financial globalization, economic history
JEL Classification: F15, F21, F30, N10, N20, O11, O16
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Globalization and Capital Markets
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
-
The Gold Standard as a `Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval'
By Michael D. Bordo and Hugh Rockoff
-
Crises Now and then: What Lessons from the Last Era of Financial Globalization
-
The Great Depression as a Watershed: International Capital Mobility Over the Long Run
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
-
Currency Mismatches, Debt Intolerance and Original Sin: Why They are Not the Same and Why it Matters
By Barry Eichengreen, Ricardo Hausmann, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Yishay Yafeh, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Paolo Mauro, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Paolo Mauro, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
By Michael D. Bordo and Finn Kydland
-
Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 Versus 1925-31
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor