From Class to Collective: The De-Americanization of Class Arbitration

54 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2010 Last revised: 14 Aug 2010

See all articles by S.I. Strong

S.I. Strong

The University of Sydney Law School

Date Written: August 10, 2010


Opponents to international class arbitration (also known as “class action arbitration” or “classwide arbitration”) frequently characterize the procedure as a “‘uniquely American’ device” and take the view that the procedure never could or never should expand beyond the United States. However, a growing number of commentators believe that large-scale group arbitration can or will spread beyond U.S. borders, although that does not necessarily mean that the procedures adopted will or should be the same as those used in U.S.-style class arbitrations. This Article considers what these new forms of group arbitration – described herein as “collective arbitration” to mirror terminology used to describe collective redress in national courts – will look like in terms of procedure. The discussion also includes analysis of certain potential problem areas, using analogies to the American Arbitration Association (AAA) Supplementary Rules for Class Arbitration as a guide, and addresses the likely enforceability of awards arising out of such actions under the New York Convention.

Keywords: international commercial arbitration, class arbitration, class action arbitration, international, enforcement, collective redress, New York Convention

Suggested Citation

Strong, S.I., From Class to Collective: The De-Americanization of Class Arbitration (August 10, 2010). Arbitration International, Vol. 26, 2010, University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-16, Available at SSRN:

S.I. Strong (Contact Author)

The University of Sydney Law School ( email )

New Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006

HOME PAGE: http://

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics