Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel
34 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2010
Date Written: August 10, 2010
Abstract
Municipal amalgamation reforms are performed in most developed countries. The basic rationale for these reforms is taking advantage of economies of scale in municipal provision of public services. Contrary to theory and common wisdom, empirical literature finds almost no benefits arising from an amalgamation. This literature, however, relies on scant evidence. The purpose of this paper is to present evidence for the budgetary outcomes of municipal amalgamations. The study is based on an extensive panel data of municipalities in Israel for the years 1999-2007. The evaluation uses the amalgamation reform of 2003 analyzed with the difference in differences methodology in order to assess changes in the budgetary situation of the amalgamated municipalities. The results indicate that the amalgamations resulted in a decrease of about 8% in municipal expenditures. I find no evidence of a decrease in the level of services in the amalgamated municipalities. The results suggest that municipal amalgamations bring economies of scale into practice.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Political Rents in a Non-Corrupt Democracy
By Helena Svaleryd and Jonas Vlachos
-
Merged Municipalities, Higher Debt: On Free-Riding and the Common Pool Problem in Politics
By Henrik Jordahl and Che-yuan Liang
-
Public Goods, Congestion and Population Size: A Non-Parametric Analysis Using French Data
By Yvon Rocaboy
-
Political Competition and Fiscal Status: Evidence from Municipalities in Israel
-
Female Policymakers and Educational Expenditures: Cross-Country Evidence
By Li-ju Chen
-
Biased Competition, Popularity Shocks, and Government Inefficiency
By Leif Helland and Rune J. Sørensen
-
Female Representation but Male Rule? Party Competition and the Political Glass Ceiling
By Olle Folke and Johanna Karin Rickne