Aspects of Deconstruction: Refuting Indeterminacy with One Bold Thought

8 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2010

Date Written: August 12, 2010

Abstract

Deconstruction has already happened on the Supreme Court. Not only can no member of the Court really believe that "the law" (self-invented by the very Court it is supposed to govern!) can constrain the result in any individual case, but its members have also convinced themselves that they have no time to be concerned with dispensing justice to the parties. The justificatory legal language used in judicial opinions is not what our law teachers told us it was. The justificatory legal language is not provided to explain - much less constrain - the result in the case. Rather, it is a mode of couching the personal legislative preferences of unelected judges in the publicly venerated language of a judicial decree.

Keywords: judicial opinions, legal determinacy, legal indeterminacy, U.S. Supreme Court

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K40

Suggested Citation

D'Amato, Anthony, Aspects of Deconstruction: Refuting Indeterminacy with One Bold Thought (August 12, 2010). Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 113, 1990; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-35. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1658149

Anthony D'Amato (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
31
Abstract Views
433
PlumX Metrics