Automatic Stabilizers and Economic Crisis: Us vs. Europe
48 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2010 Last revised: 21 Dec 2024
Date Written: August 2010
Abstract
This paper analyzes the effectiveness of the tax and transfer systems in the European Union and the US to act as an automatic stabilizer in the current economic crisis. We find that automatic stabilizers absorb 38 per cent of a proportional income shock in the EU, compared to 32 per cent in the US. In the case of an unemployment shock 47 percent of the shock are absorbed in the EU, compared to 34 per cent in the US. This cushioning of disposable income leads to a demand stabilization of up to 30 per cent in the EU and up to 20 per cent in the US. There is large heterogeneity within the EU. Automatic stabilizers in Eastern and Southern Europe are much lower than in Central and Northern European countries. We also investigate whether countries with weak automatic stabilizers have enacted larger fiscal stimulus programs. We find no evidence supporting this view.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Automatic Stabilizers and Economic Crisis: Us vs. Europe
By Mathias Dolls, Clemens Fuest, ...
-
Automatic Stabilizers and Economic Crisis: US vs. Europe
By Mathias Dolls, Clemens Fuest, ...
-
The Role of the Corporate Income Tax as an Automatic Stabilizer
By Thiess Buettner and Clemens Fuest
-
A Fiscal Union for the Euro: Some Lessons from History
By Michael D. Bordo, Agnieszka Markiewicz, ...
-
Automatic Stabilizers, Economic Crisis and Income Distribution in Europe
By Mathias Dolls, Clemens Fuest, ...
-
Fiscal Federalism: US History for Architects of Europe's Fiscal Union
By C. Randall Henning and Martin Kessler
-
The Fiscal Stimulus of 2009-10: Trade Openness, Fiscal Space and Exchange Rate Adjustment
By Joshua Aizenman and Yothin Jinjarak