Do We Need a Distinct Monetary Constitution?
28 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2010
Date Written: August 10, 2010
Abstract
The Chicago-Virginia tradition of political economy has rejected both competitive money production and money’s politicization via post-constitutional bargaining, opting instead for constitutionalization. This paper provides a constitutional political economy of the costs of inflation and argues that competitive money production is not subject to the pro-cyclicality that concerns constitutional political economy. It also meets the standard of predictability that motivates constitutional perspectives, although at the level of individual prices rather than the price level. An effective monetary constitution is implicit in any constitution that protects rights to property, contract, and exchange and sets limits on the democratic process.
Keywords: Constitutional Political Economy, Monetary Regimes, Free Banking, Inflation
JEL Classification: E58, N2
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By George Selgin, William D. Lastrapes, ...
-
By George Selgin, William D. Lastrapes, ...
-
L Street: Bagehotian Prescriptions for a 21st-Century Money Market
-
L Street: Bagehotian Prescriptions for a 21st Century Money Market
-
A Gold Standard with Free Banking Would Have Restrained the Boom and Bust
-
Monetary Policy and the Quest for Robust Political Economy
By Peter J. Boettke and Daniel J. Smith
-
Federal Reserve Independence: A Centennial Review
By Peter J. Boettke and Daniel J. Smith
-
An Episodic History of Modern Fed Independence
By Daniel J. Smith and Peter J. Boettke