Promising Paths to Pay Equity: A Comparison of the Potentials of Strategic Litigation, Collective Bargaining and Anti-Discrimination Authorities in Switzerland, Germany and France

30 Pages Posted: 28 Oct 2010

See all articles by Gesine Fuchs

Gesine Fuchs

Lucerne School of Social Work; Gesine Fuchs - Research and Consultancy

Date Written: October 26, 2010

Abstract

The gender pay gap in Europe is between 15% and 25%, and is narrowing only slowly. This poses a considerable challenge for gender equality – a core value of modernity and democracy. Three routes to reducing this gap are discussed: strategic litigation, collective bargaining and anti-discrimination authorities. EU law has been crucial for comprehensive national pay equality legislation. Recent directives have led to new anti-discrimination authorities that can investigate claims, support victims and make policy recommendations. Yet the implementation ranges from very weak to quite strong, according to different ‘worlds of compliance’ (Falkner/Treib). What have these institutions achieve to date? And how do they interact with the agenda setting and the actual pay equity policies of women’s organizations and trade unions? Like social movements in general, who have recently been framing their demands for social justice in terms of rights and the law, some women’s organizations and trade unions have also been using strategic litigation before national and European courts to further their aims. Yet many have remained sceptical about the transformative potential of jurisdiction (jurisprudence) for structural problems. Gender Mainstreaming of collective agreements has emerged as a new policy strategy of women’s trade union departments, but met with resistance from both employers and vested male union interests. Which policy is most promising in bringing about pay equity? National institutional settings, traditions and welfare regimes substantially influence actors’ strategic choices. Although every approach has certain pitfalls and some potential, the mobilization of discourses of law and rights seems crucial for any progress towards pay equity. The paper is based on comparative research in three countries – Switzerland, Germany, and France . Data includes media analysis, interviews and court decisions.

Keywords: pay equity, gender pay gap, anti-discrimination law, anti-discrimination authority, legal mobilization, strategic litigation, collective bargaining, Switzerland, Germany, France

Suggested Citation

Fuchs, Gesine, Promising Paths to Pay Equity: A Comparison of the Potentials of Strategic Litigation, Collective Bargaining and Anti-Discrimination Authorities in Switzerland, Germany and France (October 26, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664468 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1664468

Gesine Fuchs (Contact Author)

Lucerne School of Social Work ( email )

Werftestrasse 1
P. O. Box 2945
Luzern, CH-6002
Switzerland

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.hslu.ch/en/lucerne-school-of-social-work/

Gesine Fuchs - Research and Consultancy ( email )

Drahtzugstrasse 28
Basel, 4057
Switzerland

HOME PAGE: http://www.gesine-fuchs.net

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
220
Abstract Views
1,383
rank
138,701
PlumX Metrics