An Empirical Analysis of Incremental Capital Structure Decisions Under Managerial Entrenchment
42 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 1999
There are 2 versions of this paper
An Empirical Analysis of Incremental Capital Structure Decisions Under Managerial Entrenchment
Date Written: August 31, 2000
Abstract
We study incremental capital structure decisions of Dutch companies. From 1977 to 1996 these companies have made 110 issues of public and private seasoned equity and 137 public issues of straight debt. Managers of Dutch companies are entrenched. For this reason a discrepancy exists between managerial decisions and shareholder reactions. Confirming Zwiebel (1996) we find that Dutch managers avoid the disciplining role of debt allowing them to overinvest. However, the market reactions show that this overinvestment behavior is recognized. We do not find a confirmation of the adverse selection model of Myers and Majluf (1984). This is probably due to the entrenchment of managers and the prevalence of rights issues.
JEL Classification: G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Adverse Selection and the Rights Offer Paradox
By B. Espen Eckbo and Ronald W. Masulis
-
By Jun-koo Kang and René M. Stulz
-
Seasoned Equity Offerings: A Survey
By B. Espen Eckbo and Ronald W. Masulis
-
The Choice between Rights Offerings and Private Equity Placements
By Henrik Cronqvist and Mattias Nilsson
-
By Myron S. Scholes and Mark A. Wolfson
-
Equity Financing in a Myers-Majluf Framework with Private Benefits of Control
By Xueping Wu and Zheng Wang
-
Equity Financing in a Myers-Majluf Framework with Private Benefits of Control
By Xueping Wu and Zheng Wang
-
Seasoned Equity Issues in a Closely Held Market: Evidence from France
-
Do Firms Time Equity Offerings? Evidence from the 1930s and 1940s
By Timothy R. Burch, Vikram K. Nanda, ...