Freedom of Speech and Defamation: Developments in the Common Law World

Monash University Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2000

17 Pages Posted: 26 Aug 2010

See all articles by Adrienne Stone

Adrienne Stone

University of Melbourne - Law School

Date Written: August 24, 2010

Abstract

This comment traces the relationship between freedom of speech and the common law of defamation in India, Australia, South Africa, Canada, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. A central theme is the treatment of the iconic decision of the United States Supreme Court in New York Times v Sullivan. This comment shows that while the use of foreign precedent by judges in common law countries is widespread, the use of such precedent is, in the main, not uncritical. The reaction of common law courts to New York Times signals that these courts will usually reassess and exercise their own judgment in relation to even the most revered aspects of the American constitutional tradition.

Keywords: defamation, freedom of expression, New York Times v Sullivan, Australia, Canada, India, South Africa, United States, United Kingdom, comparative constitutional law

JEL Classification: K00, K19, K39

Suggested Citation

Stone, Adrienne, Freedom of Speech and Defamation: Developments in the Common Law World (August 24, 2010). Monash University Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2000. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664859

Adrienne Stone (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
303
Abstract Views
1,415
rank
98,444
PlumX Metrics