Clock Time Versus Event Time: Temporal Culture or Self-Regulation?

12 Pages Posted: 26 Aug 2010 Last revised: 21 Feb 2011

See all articles by Tamar Avnet

Tamar Avnet

Yeshiva University - Syms School of Business

Anne-Laure Sellier

Date Written: December 20, 2010

Abstract

Cross-cultural research documented two types of temporal culture governing the way individuals schedule tasks over time: clock-time, where individuals let an external clock dictate when tasks begin/end; and event-time, where tasks are planned relative to other tasks and individuals transition between them when they internally sense that the former task is complete. In contrast with this prior literature – that credits culture as the reason for variation in temporal norms – we show in two experiments that individuals choose clock- versus event-time as a self-regulation strategy to achieve a regulatory goal (efficiency vs. effectiveness). A third experiment shows that this strategy enhances confidence and performance on a task. Participants solved significantly more math problems when their task scheduling (clock- vs. event-time) matched their regulatory state (promotion vs. prevention). Since clock-/event-time may both lead to superior performance, clock-time is not the single best way to organize productive activities in industrial societies – a result that counters a foundational principle of modern economics.

Keywords: Self regulatory, promotion, regulatory focus, culture, time, event time, clock time

Suggested Citation

Avnet, Tamar and Sellier, Anne-Laure, Clock Time Versus Event Time: Temporal Culture or Self-Regulation? (December 20, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1665936 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1665936

Tamar Avnet (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Syms School of Business ( email )

New York, NY
United States

No contact information is available for Anne-Laure Sellier

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
600
Abstract Views
5,664
rank
48,064
PlumX Metrics