The Impact of the Reward Structure on Stickiness
29 Pages Posted: 7 Oct 2010 Last revised: 10 Dec 2010
Date Written: August 30, 2010
Abstract
Prior research has related cost stickiness to characteristics of the firm’s costs structure and managerial decisions. In this paper, I study the impact of the relative level of short term oriented bonuses in the manager’s reward system on stickiness. When managers have a relatively higher level of annual bonuses they have more incentives to decrease their firm’s resource level immediately after a decrease in sales. When the annual bonus is a smaller part of the total reward package, they might wait longer before they decrease the resource level, because sales might increase again in the near future.
Based on a sample of 2569 firms (16,033 firm-years) that are included in the Executive Comp database, I find that a higher percentage of bonuses in the total reward package leads to a lower stickiness level. These results are robust against the inclusion of a number of controls that capture the impact of the firm’s cost structure on stickiness.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Understanding Cost Management: What Can We Learn from the Evidence on 'Sticky Costs'?
-
The Moderating Effect of Prior Sales Changes on Asymmetric Cost Behavior
By Rajiv D. Banker, Dmitri Byzalov, ...
-
Equity Incentives and Long-Term Value Created by SG&A Expenditure
By Rajiv D. Banker, Rong Huang, ...
-
Do Earnings Targets and Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs?
-
Hospital Costs and the Cost of Empty Hospital Beds
By Martin Gaynor and Gerard F. Anderson
-
Further Evidence on the Sticky Behaviour of Costs
By Michael E. Steliaros, Dylan C. Thomas, ...
-
Active Cost Management in Banks: Evidence of Sticky Costs in Argentina, Brazil and Canada