Reference Point Dependence for Specification Bias from Quality Upgrading
22 Pages Posted: 31 Aug 2010
Date Written: August 1994
Abstract
This paper argues that whether estimates of the welfare cost of natural or artificial trade barriers that do not discriminate by quality are subject to positive or negative specification bias when using models which do not explicitly recognize quality variation depends on the reference point used in counterfactual equilibrium analysis. We use numerical general equilibrium techniques to generate counter examples to the widely held view that (in the competitive case) incorporating quality upgrading will tend to reduce the welfare costs of quality invariant trade barriers. To do this, we use a trade-distorted equilibrium as the reference point, rather than free trade.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Quality Upgrading and its Welfare Cost in U.S. Steel Imports, 1969-74
-
Tariffs vs. Quotas with Endogenous Quality
By Kala Krishna
-
Protection and the Product Line: Monopoly and Product Quality
By Kala Krishna
-
Tariffs Versus Quotas in the Presence of Imperfect Competition and Cross-Border Externalities
By Taiji Furusawa, Keisaku Higashida, ...
-
Enforcing Domestic Quality Dominance Through Quotas
By Nicolas Boccard and Xavier Wauthy
-
Measuring the Welfare Effect of Quality Change: Theory and Application of Japanese Autos
-
Strategic Policy for Product R&D with Symmetric Costs
By Naoto Jinji
