Desperate Measures: Rationalizing the Crime of Infanticide

Canadian Criminal Law Review, Vol. 14, pp. 253-272, 2010

Posted: 21 Jul 2011 Last revised: 27 Jul 2011

See all articles by Isabel Grant

Isabel Grant

University of British Columbia - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2010

Abstract

This article addresses the crime of infanticide and issues of statutory interpretation that are currently before the courts. Specifically, the comment examines the relationship between infanticide and murder and argues that the intent of the infanticide provisions in section 233 of the Criminal Code was to provide a mitigating regime for killings that would otherwise be murder. The article examines the recent trend towards charging women who kill their newly born children with murder, rather than infanticide, and the resulting judicial development of a defence of infanticide. While the article raises concerns about treating infanticide as a defence, it may be a necessary response to the tendency towards overcharging murder in cases where infanticide is a more appropriate verdict. Further, it is argued that infanticide must be interpreted in a way that acknowledges the unique role of women in pregnancy, childbirth, and child-rearing in our society and the reality faced by women who may be young, poor, socially isolated, or mentally ill and find themselves in desperate circumstances.

Keywords: Canada, Criminal Code, infanticide, murder, defences

Suggested Citation

Grant, Isabel, Desperate Measures: Rationalizing the Crime of Infanticide (2010). Canadian Criminal Law Review, Vol. 14, pp. 253-272, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1669599

Isabel Grant (Contact Author)

University of British Columbia - Faculty of Law ( email )

1822 East Mall
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,728
PlumX Metrics