A New Look at Patent Quality: Relating Patent Prosecution to Validity

Ronald J. Mann

Columbia University - Law School

Marian Underweiser


September 3, 2010

Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 381

The paper uses two hand-collected datasets to implement a novel research design for analyzing the precursors to patent quality. Operationalizing patent "quality" as legal validity, the paper analyzes the relation between Federal Circuit decisions on patent validity and three sets of data about the patents: quantitative features of the patents themselves, textual analysis of the patent documents, and data collected from the prosecution histories of the patents. The paper finds large and statistically significant relations between ex post validity and both textual features of the patents and ex ante aspects of the prosecution history (especially prior art submissions and the existence of internal patent office appeals before issuance). The results demonstrate the importance of refocusing analysis of patent quality on replicable indicators like validity, and the value that more comprehensive collection of prosecution history data can have for improving the output of the patent prosecution process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: patent, patent quality, patent prosecution

JEL Classification: K19

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 5, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Mann, Ronald J. and Underweiser, Marian, A New Look at Patent Quality: Relating Patent Prosecution to Validity (September 3, 2010). Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 381. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1671784 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1671784

Contact Information

Ronald J. Mann (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States

Marian Underweiser
IBM ( email )
33 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,622
Downloads: 354
Download Rank: 64,875
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper