Judicial Deference and Sexual Discrimination in the University

37 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2010  

Mark Bartholomew

SUNY Buffalo Law School

Date Written: 2000

Abstract

Tenure discrimination plaintiffs confront a judiciary that regularly defers to the administrative judgments of universities. Strangely, however, student plaintiffs suing under Title IX do not confront the same deferential posture. This occurs even when the student plaintiffs are suing their professors over classroom speech and academic freedom is at stake. After presenting the evidence of an asymmetrical application of judicial deference to the university, the Article critiques the Supreme Court’s decision in Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District to weaken the remedial powers of Title IX relative to Title VII. The Article then explores the arguments for and against judicial deference in the academic setting and concludes by offering some suggestion for evaluating academic gender discrimination suits and applying the deference doctrine uniformly.

Keywords: Title VII, Title IX, Tenure, Universities, Discrimination, Gebser, Academic Freedom

Suggested Citation

Bartholomew, Mark, Judicial Deference and Sexual Discrimination in the University (2000). Buffalo Women's Law Journal, Vol. 8, p. 55, 2000. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1673312

Mark Bartholomew (Contact Author)

SUNY Buffalo Law School ( email )

528 O'Brian Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260-1100
United States
716-645-5959 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
33
Abstract Views
505