Putting Computerized Instruction to the Test: A Randomized Evaluation of a "Scientifically-Based" Reading Program
50 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 2010 Last revised: 9 Sep 2022
Date Written: February 2004
Abstract
Although schools across the country are investing heavily in computers in the classroom, there is surprisingly little evidence that they actually improve student achievement. In this paper we present results from a randomized study of a well-defined use of computers in schools: a popular instructional computer program, known as Fast ForWord, which is designed to improve language and reading skills. We assess the impact of the program using four different measures of language and reading ability. Our estimates suggest that while use of the computer program may improve some aspects of students' language skills, it does not appear that these gains translate into a broader measure of language acquisition or into actual reading skills.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning
By Joshua D. Angrist and Victor Lavy
-
The Impact of Internet Subsidies in Public Schools
By Austan Goolsbee and Jonathan Guryan
-
By Ludger Woessmann and Thomas Fuchs
-
The Effect of Extra Funding for Disadvantaged Pupils on Achievement
By Edwin Leuven, Mikael Lindahl, ...
-
New Technology in Schools: Is There a Payoff?
By Stephen J. Machin, Sandra Mcnally, ...
-
Home Computer Use and the Development of Human Capital
By Ofer Malamud and Cristian Pop-eleches
-
Technology's Edge: The Educational Benefits of Computer-Aided Instruction
By Lisa Barrow, Lisa Markman, ...
-
Technology's Edge: The Educational Benefits of Computer-Aided Instruction
By Lisa Barrow, Lisa Markman, ...