U.S. Trade Policy in the 1980s: Turns -- and Roads Not Taken

70 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 2010 Last revised: 7 Sep 2022

See all articles by J. David Richardson

J. David Richardson

Syracuse University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Date Written: June 1991

Abstract

This paper is an assessment of three tilts in U.S. trade policy during the 1980s: minilateralism, managed trade, and Congressional activism. It describes their economic and political causes, and whether or not alternative policy directions might have been possible. Taking as given the unfavorable macroeconomic environment for trade policy, a few alternatives do seem possible, but only a few. Sectoral minilateralism might have been a feasible replacement for the more aggressive managed trade experiments, e.g., in semiconductors, and earlier Executive Branch initiative in drafting trade legislation of the late 1980s might have blunted some of the sharper edges of the Congressional arsenal in the 1988 act. Minilateralism is forecast to have mildly liberalizing effects in the near term. The prognosis for the effects of managed trade and Congressional activism is decidedly more mixed.

Suggested Citation

Richardson, J. David, U.S. Trade Policy in the 1980s: Turns -- and Roads Not Taken (June 1991). NBER Working Paper No. w3725, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1674289

J. David Richardson (Contact Author)

Syracuse University ( email )

900 S. Crouse Avenue
The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs 347 Eggers Hall
Syracuse, NY 13244
United States
315-443-4339 (Phone)
315-443-9085 (Fax)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States