42 Pages Posted: 3 Oct 2010
Date Written: September 12, 2010
We consider the consequences of a shared brand name such as geographical names used to identify high quality products, for the incentives of otherwise autonomous firms to invest in quality. We contend that such collective brand labels improve communication between sellers and consumers, when the scale of production is too small for individual firms to establish reputations on a stand alone basis. This has two opposing effects on member firms’ incentives to invest in quality. On the one hand, it increases investment incentives by increasing the visibility and transparency of individual member firms, which increases the return from investment in quality. On the other hand, it creates an incentive to free ride on the group’s reputation, which can lead to less investment in quality. We identify parmater values under which collective branding delivers higher quality than is achievable by stand alone firms.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Fishman, Arthur and Simhon, Avi and Finkelshtain, Israel and Yacouel, Nira, The Economics of Collective Brands (September 12, 2010). Bar-Ilan University Department of Economics Research Paper No. 2010-11. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1675707 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1675707