The Supreme Court and Exclusions by Racetracks
54 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2010 Last revised: 15 Sep 2010
Date Written: 2010
Racetrack owners have historically been able to operate racetracks with the power to exclude patrons, jockeys, and owners in whatever fashion they chose. This power was assisted by the Supreme Court which held that such exclusions were not actionable offenses. In Marrone v. Washington Jockey Club, the US Supreme Court (Justice Holmes) established the principle of total management discretion in racetrack exclusions.
This article reviews the factual background of Marrone, the pre-Marrone precedents involving racetrack exclusions, the decision itself, and the decision’s effects on the horse racing industry. The impact of this decision is largely unchanged in the last 80 years. While most remember Federal Baseball as the great sports law decision from Holmes, the Marrone decision’s impacts have remained unchanged since the decision was rendered.
Keywords: Racetracks, Sports, Horce Racing
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation