The Gold Standard as a Rule
55 Pages Posted: 15 Sep 2010 Last revised: 15 Sep 2022
Date Written: May 1990
Abstract
In this paper, we show that the monetary rule followed by a number of key countries, especially England and to a lesser extent the U. S., before 1914 represented a commitment technology preventing the monetary authorities from changing planned future policy. The experiences of these major countries suggest that the gold standard was intended as a contingent rule. By that, we mean, that the authorities could temporarily abandon the fixed price of gold during a wartime emergency on the understanding that convertibility at the original price of gold would be restored when the emergency passed. The experiences of other countries, however, suggest that the gold standard rule was often viewed more as a desirable goal than an operational constraint.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Globalization and Capital Markets
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
-
The Gold Standard as a `Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval'
By Michael D. Bordo and Hugh Rockoff
-
Crises Now and then: What Lessons from the Last Era of Financial Globalization
-
The Great Depression as a Watershed: International Capital Mobility Over the Long Run
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
-
Currency Mismatches, Debt Intolerance and Original Sin: Why They are Not the Same and Why it Matters
By Barry Eichengreen, Ricardo Hausmann, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Yishay Yafeh, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Paolo Mauro, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Paolo Mauro, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 Versus 1925-31
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
-
Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 Versus 1925-31
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor