12 Pages Posted: 17 Sep 2010 Last revised: 7 Dec 2014
Date Written: September 16, 2010
In this Response, Professor Thomas Cotter compares his concept of “practical reason,” which emphasizes the need for choice, deliberation, and communication in the face of radical uncertainty and conflicting norms, with Golden’s five principles for patent remedies. Cotter argues that the application of Golden’s principles would be grounded in a form of practical reason; both methodologies take a nondogmatic approach to making rational judgments under conditions of uncertainty. But Cotter also offers two critiques of Golden: first, Golden sometimes seems to betray a Platonic longing for something more determinate than practical reason; and second, Cotter disagrees with Golden’s analysis on specific issues within the field of patent remedies.
Keywords: patent remedies, reasonable royalties, patent damages
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Cotter, Thomas F., Response - Patent Remedies and Practical Reason (September 16, 2010). Texas Law Review See Also, Vol. 88, 2010; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-51. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1677784