Testing the Master Tools

University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, Vol. 158, p. 305, 2010

Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2010-43

13 Pages Posted: 18 Sep 2010 Last revised: 16 Jun 2011

Kimberly West-Faulcon

Loyola Law School Los Angeles; University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law Study Group

Abstract

This piece is a reply to two responses to The River Runs Dry: When Title VI Trumps State Anti-Affirmative Action Laws 157 U. PA. L. REV. 1075 (2009): Guy-Uriel E. Charles, Response, Do We Care Enough About Racial Inequality? Reflections on The River Runs Dry, 158 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 119 (2009), and Girardeau A. Spann, Response, Doctrinal Dilemma, 158 U. PA. L. REV. PENNUMBRA 129 (2009).

Keywords: antidiscrimination, equal protection, disparate impact, Title VI, standardized tests, test deficiency, Ricci v. DeStefano, civil rights, anti-affirmative action laws, strong-basis-in-evidence standard

Suggested Citation

West-Faulcon, Kimberly, Testing the Master Tools. University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, Vol. 158, p. 305, 2010; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2010-43. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1678175

Kimberly West-Faulcon (Contact Author)

Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )

919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-8172 (Phone)

University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law Study Group

Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Register to support our free research

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
rank
334,950
Abstract Views
1,731
PlumX