Environmentalism and the Supreme Court: A Cultural Analysis

62 Pages Posted: 24 Sep 2010

See all articles by Jonathan Z. Cannon

Jonathan Z. Cannon

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: 2006


This paper traces the Supreme Court’s response to key tenets of environmentalism in decisions over the last four decades. It concludes that the Court’s interpretations have worked to both sanction environmentalism and to contain or even marginalize it. The cases make clear that, while environmentalism may not be opposed on its own terms within our political culture, it challenges beliefs and values that are deeply embedded in our core institutions – such as personal autonomy, limited government, and a laissez faire economy. Many of the Court’s environmental decisions have limited the reach of environmentalist values out of deference to these competing considerations. At the same time, however, the Court has accommodated environmentalist values where competing values were not seen to compel their rejection. Taken as a body, the Court’s environmental cases not only reflect the degree to which the movement has penetrated and changed the culture, but they also suggest promising pathways for furthering environmentalist beliefs and values in the future.

Suggested Citation

Cannon, Jonathan Z., Environmentalism and the Supreme Court: A Cultural Analysis (2006). Ecology Law Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 363, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1681473

Jonathan Z. Cannon (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics