The Terrorist Detention Review Reform Act: Detention Policy and Political Reality

32 Pages Posted: 27 Sep 2010

Date Written: September 27, 2010

Abstract

Since the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene, federal judges have fashioned a variety of procedural rules to govern habeas proceedings involving detainees held at Guantanamo Bay. While judges and commentators have called for statutory guidance, politics and substantive disagreement have prevented Congress and the President from clarifying the applicable procedural rules.

In the Terrorist Detention Review Reform Act, Senator Lindsey Graham offered legislation to untangle the many procedural issues facing the courts. From the scope of the President’s detention authority to the use of coerced testimony, the bill would construct a statutory framework for adjudicating habeas petitions by law of war detainees. The current political environment creates incentives for Congress and the President to abdicate their responsibility for detention policy to the courts, but the nation would be better served by the certainty of procedural rules considered and ratified by the political branches of government.

Keywords: terrorism, habeas corpus, constitutional law, politics, legislation

Suggested Citation

Kuhn, Walter E., The Terrorist Detention Review Reform Act: Detention Policy and Political Reality (September 27, 2010). Seton Hall Legislative Journal, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1683636
No contact information is available for Walter E. Kuhn

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
139
Abstract Views
836
rank
212,555
PlumX Metrics