A Substantive Conception of the Rule of Law: Non-Arbitrary Treatment and the Limits of Procedure

NOMOS L: GETTING TO THE RULE OF LAW, NYU Press, 2011

14 Pages Posted: 29 Sep 2010 Last revised: 27 Jun 2012

See all articles by Corey L. Brettschneider

Corey L. Brettschneider

Brown University - Department of Political Science; Fordham University School of Law

Date Written: September 28, 2010

Abstract

In his contribution to this volume of Nomos, Jeremy Waldron develops a conception of the rule of law that emphasizes the centrality of procedural guarantees in the courtroom, such as rights to an attorney, to an impartial judge, and to a fair trial. Procedural guarantees should be respected, writes Waldron, because they protect the dignity of individuals as “active intelligences.” In my contribution to the same Nomos volume, I draw on Waldron’s powerful case for the importance of procedures to develop an argument for a more substantive understanding of the rule of law. Specifically, I emphasize two ways that Waldron’s argument might be expanded. I argue first that Waldron’s appeal to dignity as the moral basis of procedures commits him to an account of substantive guarantees. These guarantees may limit, at times, the procedural dimensions of both law and democratic decision-making. Second, I expand on Waldron’s notion of dignity - itself a substantive value - as respect for “active intelligence.” In particular, I argue that those subject to law are entitled to non-arbitrary treatment. When dignity is theorized in this way, we can better understand the relationship between the substantive values at the heart of the rule of law and their substantive implications. This expanded conception of dignity more clearly distinguishes between the concept of the rule of law and the ideal of democratic self-rule. I also specify ways in which our approaches to theorizing the rule of law parallel our competing theories of democracy.

Keywords: Rule of Law, Waldron, Democracy, Fuller, Jurisprudence, Criminal Law, Procedure, Substance, Self-Government, Dignity

Suggested Citation

Brettschneider, Corey, A Substantive Conception of the Rule of Law: Non-Arbitrary Treatment and the Limits of Procedure (September 28, 2010). NOMOS L: GETTING TO THE RULE OF LAW, NYU Press, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1684127

Corey Brettschneider (Contact Author)

Brown University - Department of Political Science ( email )

Box 1844
Providence, RI 02912
United States

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
407
rank
66,802
Abstract Views
2,397
PlumX Metrics