The Logic of Legitimacy: Bootstrapping Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy

54 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2010

See all articles by Christopher F. Zurn

Christopher F. Zurn

University of Massachusetts Boston - Department of Philosophy

Date Written: August 18, 2010

Abstract

Many have claimed that legitimate constitutional democracy is either conceptually or practically impossible, given infinite regress paradoxes deriving from the requirement of simultaneously democratic and constitutional origins for legitimate government. This paper first critically investigates prominent conceptual and practical bootstrapping objections to the legitimacy of constitutional democracy advanced by Barnett and Michelman. It then argues that the real conceptual root of such objections is not any specific, substantive account of legitimacy, in terms of, say, consent or democratic endorsement, but rather a particular conception of the logic of normative standards - the determinate threshold conception - that the critic attributes to the putatively undermined account of legitimacy. The paper further claims that when we abandon threshold conceptions of the logic of legitimacy in favor of regulative ideal conceptions, then the objections from bootstrapping paradoxes to the very idea of constitutional democracy disappear. It concludes with considerations in favor of adopting a more demanding conception of the regulative ideal of constitutional democracy, advanced by Habermas, focusing on potentials for developmental learning.

Keywords: Constitutionalism, Democracy, Legitimacy, Paradox

Suggested Citation

Zurn, Christopher F., The Logic of Legitimacy: Bootstrapping Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy (August 18, 2010). Legal Theory, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1684621

Christopher F. Zurn (Contact Author)

University of Massachusetts Boston - Department of Philosophy ( email )

Wheatley Hall 05-017
100 Morrissey Blvd.
Boston, MA 02125
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
319
Abstract Views
1,630
Rank
173,430
PlumX Metrics