The Rule 23(b)(3) Superiority Requirement and Transnational Class Actions: Excluding Foreign Class Members in Favor of European Remedies
50 Pages Posted: 3 Oct 2010
Date Written: October 3, 2010
This Article analyzes the way federal courts have conducted their superiority inquiries on motions for class certification in transnational class actions. Opt-out class actions under Rule 23(b)(3) conflict with an important premise of legal systems around the world, namely, that one cannot be bound to a judgment unless one affirmatively participated in the lawsuit. The federal courts sometimes either decline to certify the class or exclude foreign class members from the class because of the risk that the courts of foreign countries will not enforce the class action judgment. This Article argues that the current approach inefficiently exposes the parties to costly litigation and risk. In order to efficiently achieve the purposes of Rule 23, courts should exclude foreign class members when it is unclear that foreign courts would enforce the judgment. This solution would efficiently avoid the inconsistent results that the current approach has generated and is further justified in light of the emerging mechanisms for settling and litigating mass claims in Europe. This Article highlights the Dutch Collective Settlement Act of 2005 as one such mechanism that has already had a significant impact on transnational class action litigation.
Keywords: Class Actions, Transnational Litigation, Foreign-cubed, Res Judicata, Vivendi, Preclusion, Superiority, Nonrecognition
JEL Classification: K20, K22, K23, K40, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation