An Appraisal Puzzle

George S. Geis

University of Virginia School of Law

Northwestern University Law Review, 2011
Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2010-10

The division of power between majority and minority shareholders raises a fundamental tension for corporate law scholars. Awarding minority owners too much say can hinder effective decision making and introduce holdout problems. But naked majority rule only breeds a different malady by handing controlling shareholders the power to steal from minority owners. This governance conflict plays out in a variety of contexts but presents itself most explicitly during freezeout mergers.

Appraisal rights are a statutory attempt to deal with this problem. These laws do not directly prevent freezeouts; rather, they impose a liability rule where minority holders can demand fair value for their shares when they object to a deal. Unfortunately, this remedy functions rather poorly, and legal scholars have mostly scoffed at appraisal rights for the last half-century.

Interestingly, however, several recent developments in the back offices of Wall Street and the courthouses of Delaware have created a new appraisal puzzle. The problem relates to identity ambiguity. Appraisal statutes are written to cover record holders (the direct owners listed on a firm’s books). Yet under modern securities settlement practices the identity of these clearinghouse owners no longer changes during the sale of stock. And recent precedent now permits beneficial owners (the real investors) to obtain appraisal even if they purchase shares after voting rights on the merger have been severed from the stock. This introduces what I will call amplified appraisal claims, where a large number of investors can seek appraisal - each insisting that they have claim to a smaller pool of “qualified” shares. Such a development has the potential to turn the dynamics of a freeze-out merger on its head. This Article describes the appraisal identity puzzle, analyzes the theoretical implications for majority and minority shareholders, and proposes a normative response.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: appraisal rights

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 10, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Geis, George S., An Appraisal Puzzle. Northwestern University Law Review, 2011; Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2010-10. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1687734

Contact Information

George S. Geis (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,010
Downloads: 189
Download Rank: 125,194
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Appraisal Arbitrage and the Future of Public Company M&A
By Minor Myers and Charles Korsmo