23 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2010
Date Written: January 1, 2010
There are several religious groups that order a specific distribution of the estate, which includes disinheritance of daughters in favor of sons. A testator’s choice to follow this rule presents a fascinating intersection of conflicting values, world-views, and belief systems. In this Article, I examine the legal treatment of such bequests, and present different solutions from different inheritance law systems. I review three types of systems, Continental law of forced heirship, family provision jurisdictions, and testamentary freedom systems. I claim that deciding these cases is ultimately connected to a legal system’s perception of inheritance. In several systems this function includes recognizing a child’s interest in belonging to the family. If we understand inheritance as communicating a message regarding a child’s belongingness to her family, then gender bias disinheritance should be reviewed with caution. In testamentary freedom systems, the question seems to be quite simple as such a distribution is well within the testator’s prerogative. However, I suggest a more intricate analysis based on the doctrine of public policy.
Keywords: Inheritance, Gender, Religion, Property, Family, Belonging, Continuity
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Kreiczer-Levy, Shelly, Religiously Inspired Gender-Bias Disinheritance – What’s Law Got to Do with It? (January 1, 2010). Creighton Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, p. 669, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1688289