26 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2010 Last revised: 4 Nov 2010
Date Written: October 6, 2010
Proponents of the rule of law argue about whether that ideal should be conceived formalistically or in terms of substantive values. Formalistically, the rule of law is associated with principles like generality, clarity, prospectivity, consistency, etc. Substantively, it is associated with market values, with constitutional rights, and with freedom and human dignity. In this paper, I argue for a third layer of complexity: the procedural aspect of the rule of law; the aspects of rule-of-law requirements that have to do with "natural Justice" or "procedural due process." These I believe have been neglected in the jurisprudential literature devoted specifically to the idea of the rule of law and they deserve much greater emphasis. Moreover procedural values go beyond elementary principles like the guarantee of an unbiased tribunal or the opportunity to present and confront evidence. They include the right to argue in a court about what the law is and what its bearing should be on one's situation. The provision that law makes for argument is necessarily unsettling, and so this emphasis on the procedural aspect highlights the point predictability should not be regarded as the be-all and end-all of the rule of law.
Keywords: legal argument, natural justice, predictability, procedural due process, procedure, rule of law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Waldron, Jeremy, The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure (October 6, 2010). NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-73. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1688491 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1688491
By John Finnis