Can Globalization Be a Referential Object in Semantics or Not?

JEZIK KNJIŽEVNOST, GLOBALIZACIJA, pp. 19-25, Filozofski Fakultet, ed., Univerzitet u Nišu, 2008

7 Pages Posted: 9 Oct 2010

See all articles by Djordje Vidanovic

Djordje Vidanovic

University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy

Date Written: October 7, 2010

Abstract

I have tried to show that the much (ab)used concept of “globalization” is only a social fact that requires some kind of multiple intentionality, but apparently lacks any epistemological objectivity due to its inherent lack of intersubjective agreement. I was thus able to infer that the concept of ‘globalization’ is not prone to semantic inquiry based on traditional referentiality as it possesses none.

Keywords: Searle, Durkheim, globalization, referentiality, social fact, mental fact, physical fact, intersubjective agreement, multiple intentionality

Suggested Citation

Vidanovic, Djordje, Can Globalization Be a Referential Object in Semantics or Not? (October 7, 2010). JEZIK KNJIŽEVNOST, GLOBALIZACIJA, pp. 19-25, Filozofski Fakultet, ed., Univerzitet u Nišu, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1689258

Djordje Vidanovic (Contact Author)

University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy ( email )

Cirila i Metodija 2
18000 Niš
Niš, 18000
Republic of Serbia

HOME PAGE: http://www.ni.ac.rs

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
41
Abstract Views
388
PlumX Metrics