References (41)



Is Credit Risk Really Higher in Islamic Banks?

Aniss Boumediene

affiliation not provided to SSRN

October 9, 2010

This article explores empirically the assertion that Islamic Banks have higher credit risk than Conventional Banks. A definition, identification and the way to manage credit risk are given to each Islamic financial tool. This risk is, then, measured on nine Islamic and nine Conventional Banks, using Contingent Claims Analysis (CCA). Merton’s model (1974), based on Black & Scholes’ (1973) option pricing formula, allowed the measure of the Distance-to-Default (DD) and Default probability (DP) from 2005 to 2009. Islamic Banks have a mean DD of 204 significantly higher than conventional Banks (DD = 15). Mean DP equals 0.03 and 0.05 respectively. Afterward, cumulative logistic probability distribution has been used to derive DP from DD. Results are more satisfying; the distribution of DP has larger tails which respond to the critic against the use of a normal distribution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: Islamic Banking, Default Probability, Contingent Claims Analysis, Credit Risk, Distance-to-Default, Merton Model, Logistic Distribution

JEL Classification: G13, G21, G32, C13, C25

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 10, 2010 ; Last revised: March 19, 2012

Suggested Citation

Boumediene, Aniss, Is Credit Risk Really Higher in Islamic Banks? (October 9, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1689885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1689885

Contact Information

Aniss Boumediene (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,973
Downloads: 659
Download Rank: 29,763
References:  41
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Stability of Islamic Banks During the Subprime Crisis
By Aniss Boumediene and Jerome Caby