Footnotes (54)



The Prevention of Torture Bill, 2010: A Briefing Document

Arghya Sengupta

University of Oxford

Sanhita Ambast

Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy

Prasan Dhar

Harvard Law School

Mihir Naniwadekar

Mumbai High Court

V. Niranjan

One Essex Court

September 22, 2010

The Prevention of Torture Bill, 2010 is a legislation which primarily aims to provide for punishment for acts of torture committed or abetted or consented to, by public servants. As stated both in the Preamble, as well as in the Statement of Objects and Reasons, the ostensible rationale for its formulation is the fulfilment of the requirement of an enabling legislation, necessary if India is to ratify the United Nations Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1975 [hereinafter “the CAT”]. Accordingly, the Bill defines torture, prescribes necessary punishment and provides certain procedural safeguards relating to the process of investigation. The precise enumerations of these aspects in the Bill however have attracted considerable popular criticism.

In this report, we undertake a detailed legal analysis of the provisions of the Bill, an approach we believe will further inform the already vibrant public debate, and thereby be of significant use to the Hon’ble Committee in suggesting reforms. To this end, we take up each clause in the Bill individually and undertake two specific assessments: First, whether the clause is compliant with CAT, which is the stated purpose of the Bill; secondly, an independent legal analysis of the words and phrases in the Bill, in light of concurrent provisions in criminal law and Supreme Court precedent in this regard. Our analysis indicates that the Bill falls short of meeting India’s international law obligations, while at the same time it contains several clauses which are theoretically unsound and may create several undesirable ramifications in practice. On the basis of this analysis, we suggest appropriate amendments to the clauses, which will secure necessary compliance with international law obligations under CAT as well as ensure that interpretive difficulties under domestic law are smoothened to make the provisions in the Bill defensible in theory and efficacious in practice.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Torture Bill, India, Anti-Torture, Convention against Torture

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 18, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Sengupta, Arghya and Ambast, Sanhita and Dhar, Prasan and Naniwadekar, Mihir and Niranjan, V., The Prevention of Torture Bill, 2010: A Briefing Document (September 22, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1693772 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1693772

Contact Information

Arghya Sengupta
University of Oxford ( email )
Balliol College
Broad Street
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX13BJ
United Kingdom
Sanhita Ambast (Contact Author)
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy ( email )
Medford, MA 02155
Prasan Dhar
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Mihir Naniwadekar
Mumbai High Court
V. Niranjan
One Essex Court ( email )
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,211
Downloads: 227
Download Rank: 106,175
Footnotes:  54