26 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2010
Date Written: September 27, 2010
Human rights law does not appear to enjoy as high a level of compliance as the laws of war, yet is institutionalized to a greater degree. This paper argues that the reason for this difference is related to the strategic structure of international law. The laws of war are governed by a regime of reciprocity, which can produce self-enforcing patterns of behavior, whereas the human rights regime attempts to produce public goods and is thus subject to collective action problems. The more elaborate human rights institutions are designed to overcome these problems but fall prey to second-order collective action problems. The simple laws of war institutions have been successful because they can exploit the logic of reciprocity. The paper also suggests that limits on military reprisals are in tension with self-enforcement of the laws of war. The U.S. conflict with Al Qaeda is discussed.
Keywords: International Law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Posner, Eric A., Human Rights, the Laws of War, and Reciprocity (September 27, 2010). University of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 537. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1693974 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1693974
By Eric Posner
By Joseph Raz