Enforcing Cap and Trade: A Tale of Two Programs

28 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2010 Last revised: 7 Mar 2011

Lesley K. McAllister

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Date Written: March 3, 2011

Abstract

The ease of enforcement is often identified as a benefit of cap and trade regulation. Almost all such assertions are made based on the experience of the Acid Rain Program, a cap and trade program implemented by the US Environmental Protection Agency in 1995 to cap the sulfur dioxide emissions from the nation’s power plants. However, RECLAIM, a cap and trade program that began the year before in Los Angeles’s South Coast Air Quality Management District, tells a very different story about how difficult and resource-intensive the enforcement of a cap and trade program can be. This article describes and analyzes enforcement data from these two programs to show that even when enforcement provisions are designed in a similar way, the enforcement systems and enforcement outcomes that prevail may be very different. The article features an empirical analysis of RECLAIM enforcement cases from the beginning of the program through 2006, characterizing them in terms of number, type, case processing times, and penalty amounts.

Keywords: cap and trade, emissions trading, Acid Rain Program, RECLAIM, enforcement

JEL Classification: K23, K32

Suggested Citation

McAllister, Lesley K., Enforcing Cap and Trade: A Tale of Two Programs (March 3, 2011). San Diego Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1694157

Lesley K. McAllister (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

400 Mrak Hall Dr
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201

Paper statistics

Downloads
76
Rank
260,146
Abstract Views
1,591