Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity: Fact or Fiction?
55 Pages Posted: 23 Oct 2010 Last revised: 7 Nov 2015
Date Written: November 6, 2015
Abstract
We examine whether internal funds matter for investment when the measurement error in q is addressed. By carefully employing methodologies that tackle the measurement error in q, we show that cash flow is a significant determinant of investment. We also find that an analyst forecast based q measure is not superior to a stock market based one. We further propose an approach that uses two alternative proxies of q as instruments for addressing measurement error. Our evidence indicates that instrumental variables type GMM estimators yield empirically well specified models.
Keywords: Investment, internal funds, measurement error, financial econometrics
JEL Classification: G14, G31, G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Measurement Errors in Investment Equations
By Heitor Almeida, Murillo Campello, ...
-
Measurement Errors in Investment Equations
By Heitor Almeida, Murillo Campello, ...
-
Treating Measurement Error in Tobin’s Q
By Timothy Erickson and Toni M. Whited
-
Common Errors: How to (and Not to) Control for Unobserved Heterogeneity
By Todd A. Gormley and David A. Matsa
-
More on the Performance of Higher Order Moment Estimators in Investment Equations
By Heitor Almeida, Murillo Campello, ...
-
Firm Size and Corporate Investment
By Vito D. Gala and Brandon Julio
-
Managerial Entrenchment and Corporate Risk Management
By Praveen Kumar and Ramon Rabinovitch
-
Investment and the Weighted Average Cost of Capital
By Murray Z. Frank and Tao Shen
-
A Granular Analysis of Corporate Investment
By Gustavo Grullon, John Hund, ...