Reevaluating the L3C: Mistaken Assumptions and Potential Solutions

26 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2010 Last revised: 30 Oct 2010

Matthew F. Doeringer

Ropes & Gray LLP

Date Written: May 7, 2010

Abstract

This paper tracks the development of the L3C, analyzes why the assumptions held by the proponents of the L3C have not come to fruition, and examines the possibilities to help the L3C reach its potential of opening new streams of capital for social enterprise. Part I discusses the current use of Program-Related Investments ("PRIs") by foundations in the United States. Part II examines the development of the L3C. Part III explores current status of the L3C and its underlying assumptions. Part IV analyzes certain proposed federal legislation and IRS regulations that could affect the L3C. Part V addresses the future of the L3C and proposes policies to ensure that the L3C serves its intended purpose, suggesting that any successful reforms need to focus on the distribution of the costs involved with PRIs rather than just focusing on minimizing these costs.

Keywords: L3C, social enterprise, social entrepreneurship, hybrid entities, double bottom line

Suggested Citation

Doeringer, Matthew F., Reevaluating the L3C: Mistaken Assumptions and Potential Solutions (May 7, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1696267 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1696267

Matthew F. Doeringer (Contact Author)

Ropes & Gray LLP ( email )

Prudential Tower
800 Boylston St.
Boston, MA 02199
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
309
Rank
78,636
Abstract Views
1,311