Are Monthly Seasonals Real? A Three Century Perspective
The Review of Finance, Forthcoming
74 Pages Posted: 26 Oct 2010 Last revised: 6 Sep 2012
Date Written: September 6, 2012
Abstract
Over 300 years of UK stock returns reveal that well-known monthly seasonals are sample specific. For instance, the January effect only emerges around 1830. Most months have had their 50 years of fame, showing the importance of long time series to safeguard against sample selection bias, noise, and data snooping. The overall conclusion is that monthly seasonals might simply be in the eye of the beholder.
Keywords: Historical Data, Stock Return Seasonality, January Effect, Seasonal Anomalies, Sell in May, Halloween Indicator, Tax Loss Selling
JEL Classification: G10, G14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Good Day Sunshine: Stock Returns and the Weather
By David Hirshleifer and Tyler Shumway
-
Winter Blues: A Sad Stock Market Cycle
By Mark J. Kamstra, Lisa A. Kramer, ...
-
The Halloween Indicator, 'Sell in May and Go Away': Another Puzzle
By Ben Jacobsen and Sven Bouman
-
Losing Sleep at the Market: The Daylight-Savings Anomaly
By Mark J. Kamstra, Lisa A. Kramer, ...
-
Are Investors Moonstruck? - Lunar Phases and Stock Returns
By Lu Zheng, Kathy Yuan, ...
-
Lunar Cycle Effects in Stock Returns
By Ilia D. Dichev and Troy D. Janes
-
Rain or Shine: Where is the Weather Effect?
By Ning Zhu and William N. Goetzmann
-
Rain or Shine: Where is the Weather Effect?
By Ning Zhu and William N. Goetzmann
-
By Ben Jacobsen and Wessel Marquering