Federalism, Ethnicity and Human Rights in Nepal Or: Althusius meets Acharya

DALITS IN FEDERALISM, M. B. Bk and C. Bishwakarma, eds., Dalit Welfare Organization, 2009

6 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2010

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

The article addresses one of the difficult tasks of the Nepal Constituent Assembly: how to translate the idea and mechanisms of federalism in ways that are faithful to the best interests of the Nepal people, into a constitution of a democratic, human rights-respecting Nepal republic. The reflections concern four varieties of federal elements, discussing arguments in favor and against each drawn from an interpretation of other states’ experiences. Two of the four are territorial: Constitutional – an entrenched split of powers - and Political: decentralised autonomy. Two are non-territorial: Minority Rights, and Minority Representation in common decision making bodies. Some of these arguments and lessons may be helpful also for Nepal’s challenges, two features of which are especially noteworthy: there are very many different groups that must be accommodated fairly. And members of these groups very often live side by side on the same territory. Human rights protections combined with federal elements of Nepal’s new constitution must serve to prevent future domination, especially by the centres, over these many ethnic groups and castes.

Keywords: Nepal, Federalism, ILO 169, Minorities, Dalits

Suggested Citation

Follesdal, Andreas, Federalism, Ethnicity and Human Rights in Nepal Or: Althusius meets Acharya (2009). DALITS IN FEDERALISM, M. B. Bk and C. Bishwakarma, eds., Dalit Welfare Organization, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1704383

Andreas Follesdal (Contact Author)

Pluricourts ( email )

P.O. Box 6706
St. Olavs plass 5
0130 Oslo
Norway

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
rank
316,411
Abstract Views
520
PlumX Metrics