Liberal Contractualism - Partial and Particularist, Impartial and Cosmopolitan

INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE: COSMOPOLITANISM AND ITS CRITICS, S. Caney, and P. Lehning, eds., Routledge, 2009

29 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2010

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

Several authors have explored or defended moderate nationalism, characterised by limited partiality for fellow nationals or fellow citizens, and loyalty to the laws and institutions of one's own society. Critics have argued that such loyalties are incompatible with "cosmopolitan" universalist liberalism, on at least two grounds. The article seeks to rebut these objections from a liberal contractualist position similar to that of Rawls, Dworkin and Scanlon. Liberal theories are thought to disallow deviations from impartial treatment and therefore rule out substantive special claims among compatriots. The scope for contractualist partiality is the subject of section 2. Liberal theories are also considered unable to account for political duties - the duty to comply with the just laws and institutions of one's own state. The contractualist grounds for political allegiance are addressed in section 3. This is not to say that liberal contractualism endorses nationalism understood as a principle of political order, that political and cultural/ethnic boundaries should coincide. A brief sketch of some elements of Liberal Contractualism is presented in section 1.

Keywords: Liberalism, Cosmopolitanism, Liberal Contractualism, Justice

Suggested Citation

Follesdal, Andreas, Liberal Contractualism - Partial and Particularist, Impartial and Cosmopolitan (2009). INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE: COSMOPOLITANISM AND ITS CRITICS, S. Caney, and P. Lehning, eds., Routledge, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1704403

Andreas Follesdal (Contact Author)

Pluricourts ( email )

P.O. Box 6706
St. Olavs plass 5
0130 Oslo
Norway

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
rank
351,640
Abstract Views
561
PlumX Metrics