42 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2010 Last revised: 19 Feb 2011
Date Written: November 17, 2010
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act empowers the executive branch to designate organizations and individuals “Specially Designated Global Terrorists.” Though IEEPA designation is used against both domestic and foreign entities, its consequences are most severe within the United States. The designee’s assets are frozen and transacting with the designee becomes a federal felony. For an American organization, IEEPA designation is a death sentence. For an American individual, it amounts to house arrest. This Article analyzes IEEPA using the Mendoza-Martinez test for determining whether a purportedly civil statute imposes criminal punishment and concludes that IEEPA designation of U.S. persons violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by imposing criminal punishment without providing the required procedural protections. This Article offers a new framework for evaluating preventive counterterrorism policies and provides clarity to a notoriously unclear area of constitutional law - the jurisprudence of the civil-criminal divide.
Keywords: Counterterrorism, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, International Emergency Economic Powers Act, IEEPA, Designation, Bill of Rights, Criminal Procedure, National Security
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Sandberg-Zakian, Eric, Counterterrorism, the Constitution, and the Civil-Criminal Divide: Evaluating the Designation of U.S. Persons Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (November 17, 2010). Harvard Journal on Legislation, Vol. 48, p. 95, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1710534