Deterrence from Self-Protection Measures in the ‘Market Model’ of Crime: Dynamic Panel Data Estimates from Employment in Private Security Occupations

Posted: 19 Nov 2010

See all articles by Paul R. Zimmerman

Paul R. Zimmerman

U.S. Federal Trade Commission - Bureau of Economics

Date Written: November 17, 2010

Abstract

Private individuals and entities invest in a wide variety of market-provisioned self-protection devices or services to mitigate their probability of victimization to crime. However, evaluating the effect of such private security measures remains understudied in the economics of crime literature. Unlike most previous studies, the present analysis considers four separate measures of private security: security guards, detectives and investigators, security system installers, and locksmiths. The effects of laws allowing the concealed carrying of weapons (an unobservable precaution) are also evaluated. Given that Ehrlich’s ‘market model’ suggests private security is endogenous to crime, the analysis relies primarily on dynamic panel data methods to derive consistent parameter estimates of the effect of self-protection measures. The relationship between self-protection and UCR Part II Index offense (arrest) data are also considered in order to provide exploratory evidence on the interaction between publicly and privately provisioned crime deterrence efforts.

Keywords: Crime, Deterrence, Market Model, Private Security, Self-Protection

JEL Classification: K42

Suggested Citation

Zimmerman, Paul R., Deterrence from Self-Protection Measures in the ‘Market Model’ of Crime: Dynamic Panel Data Estimates from Employment in Private Security Occupations (November 17, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1710637

Paul R. Zimmerman (Contact Author)

U.S. Federal Trade Commission - Bureau of Economics ( email )

601 New Jersey Ave. NW
Rm. 8103
Washington, DC 20580
United States

HOME PAGE: http://paul.r.zimmerman.googlepages.com/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
402
PlumX Metrics