Antitrust, Governance, and Postseason College Football

34 Pages Posted: 19 Nov 2010 Last revised: 21 Jul 2013

Michael McCann

University of New Hampshire School of Law; Sports Illustrated and SI.com; Mississippi College School of Law

Date Written: March 30, 2011

Abstract

This Article examines the compatibility of the Bowl Championship Series (“BCS”) with federal antitrust law and the appropriateness of the federal government using its formal and informal powers to encourage a new format for postseason college football. The Article begins by examining the legality of the BCS under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. It then discusses the appropriateness of government actors concerning themselves with, and expending taxpayer dollars on, the scheduling of college football games. The Article concludes by offering possible changes to the scheduling structure of postseason college football, with an emphasis on voluntary, efficiency-promoting changes by the colleges, universities, and conferences currently associated with the BCS.

Keywords: Antitrust Law, College Football, Postseason, Bowl Championship Series

Suggested Citation

McCann, Michael, Antitrust, Governance, and Postseason College Football (March 30, 2011). Boston College Law Review, Vol. 52, p. 517, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1711244

Michael A. McCann (Contact Author)

University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )

Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property
2 White Street
Concord, NH 03301
603.513.5254 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.unh.edu/about/personnel/faculty/michael-mccann

Sports Illustrated and SI.com

1271 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
United States

HOME PAGE: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/writers/michael_mccann/archive/index.html

Mississippi College School of Law

151 East Griffith Street
Jackson, MS 39157

HOME PAGE: http://law.mc.edu/faculty/profile_mccann.htm

Paper statistics

Downloads
616
Rank
34,438
Abstract Views
3,167