A Very Streamlined Introduction to Bush v. Gore

St. Thomas Law Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 449-460, 2011

George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 10-61

13 Pages Posted: 24 Nov 2010 Last revised: 23 Nov 2013

Nelson Lund

George Mason University School of Law

Date Written: November 22, 2010

Abstract

Bush v. Gore is among the most reviled Supreme Court decisions in recent times. It is also one of the most widely misunderstood. This is partly because of the highly complex series of events that preceded the Court’s decision. But it is mostly because the Court’s opinion has been insistently mischaracterized by legions of academics and other pundits who simply hate what the Court did. Elsewhere, I have provided detailed analyses of the decision. Here, I will offer a concise explanation of what the Court did and why, and perhaps equally important what it did not do.

Keywords: 2000 Presidential Election, Ballots, Constitutionality, County, Dade, Democratic, Dissent, Equal Protection Clause, Federalism, Florida, Invalid, Justices, Katherine Harris, Majority, Miami, Overvote, Palm Beach, Recount, Republican, Statewide, Unconstitutional, Undervote, Volusia, Voting Machine

JEL Classification: D72

Suggested Citation

Lund, Nelson, A Very Streamlined Introduction to Bush v. Gore (November 22, 2010). St. Thomas Law Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 449-460, 2011; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 10-61. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1713464

Nelson Robert Lund (Contact Author)

George Mason University School of Law ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8045 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
249
Rank
101,019
Abstract Views
1,326