Citations (2)


Footnotes (67)



Does Disclosure Matter?

Florencia Marotta-Wurgler

New York University School of Law

November 23, 2010

NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 10-54

Disclosure has long been the preferred regulatory approach to curtail one-sided standard form contract terms. Examples include the Truth in Lending Act, the new "ALI Principles of the Law of Software Contracts," and many other proposals which await Congressional approval. The appeal of disclosure is that it is relatively low cost, improves consumer decision-making and preserves consumer choice. For disclosure to be effective, however, it must increase readership and understanding of contracts to a meaningful rate, and, conditional on readership, contract content must be relevant to purchase decisions. This paper tests both these necessary conditions. We follow the clickstream of 47,399 households to 81 Internet software retailers to measure contract readership as a function of disclosure. We find that making contracts more prominently available does not increase readership in any significant way. In addition, the purchasing behavior of those few consumers who read contracts is unaffected by the one-sidedness of their terms. The results suggest that mandating disclosure online should not on its own be expected to have large effects on contract content.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 24, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia, Does Disclosure Matter? (November 23, 2010). NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 10-54. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1713860 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1713860

Contact Information

Florencia Marotta-Wurgler (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
HOME PAGE: http://its.law.nyu.edu/facultyprofiles/profile.cfm?personID=27875

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,433
Downloads: 559
Download Rank: 37,049
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  67
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper